ITB Private Pages CSS
Ethics and discipline are key to maintaining the integrity of competitive bridge. See below for rules of conduct at the table and forms to dispute gameplay.
- Disciplinary Actions
- ACBL Code of Disciplinary Regulations
- Player Memos
- Disciplinary Processes
- Other Policies
Hearing Reports Under Discipline List Members Not in Good Standing FAQ
Hearing Reports
Hearing Reports Are Organized According to the Date Charges Were Filed.
- ♠ In re: Elinor Borsook and Cathi Freedman, 2024-ACBL-1
- A&C Panel Report (posted 2/27/24)
- ♠ In re: Bob Rosenblatt, 2024-ACBL-2
- A&C Hearing Report (posted 2/15/24)
- ♠ In re: Arlene Feldman and Nancy Orovitz, 2024-ACBL-3
- A&C Hearing Report (posted 2/15/24)
- ♠ In re: Hans and Nancy Strohmer, 2024-ACBL-5
- A&C Panel Report (posted 3/30/24)
- ♠ In re: Dennis Blackketter and Nancy Motlong, 2024-ACBL-6
- Panel Report (posted 3/24/24)
- A&C Panel Repor (posted 4/8/24)
- ♠ In re: Stephen and Marilyn Fabian, 2024-ACBL-8
- FTD Panel Report (posted 4/8/24)
- ♠ In re: Randee Braslow, 2024-ACBL-10
- A&C Panel Report (revised 8/6/24)
- ♠ In re: Myra Rosenberg, 2024-ACBL-11
- A&C Panel Report (revised 8/6/24)
- ♠ In re: Norman Braslow, 2024-ACBL-12
- A&C Panel Report (revised 8/6/24)
- ♠ In re: Andrew Rosenberg, 2024-ACBL-13
- A&C Panel Report (posted 4/19/24)
- ♠ In re: Susan Kennedy, 2024-ACBL-14(A)
- FTD Panel Report (posted 4/8/24)
- ♠ In re: Molly Walsh, 2024-ACBL-14(B)
- IBA Consent Award (posted 8/29/24)
- ♠ In re: Erin Bealles, 2024-ACBL-16
- A&C Panel Report (posted 4/5/24)
- ♠ In re: Barbara Fogle, 2024-ACBL-17
- A&C Panel Report (revised 8/6/24)
- ♠ In re: Nutan Saraiya, 2024-ACBL-19
- A&C Panel Report (revised 8/6/24)
- ♠ In re: Carolyn Bernstein, 2024-ACBL-20
- A&C Panel Report (revised 8/6/24)
- ♠ In re: Joan Phillips, 2024-ACBL-21
- A&C Panel Report (posted 3/27/24)
- ♠ In re: Melinda Dahlman, 2024-ACBL-22
- A&C Panel Report (revised 8/6/24)
- ♠ In re: Susan Glazer, 2024-ACBL-23
- A&C Panel Report (revised 8/6/24)
- ♠ In re: Arvind Shah, 2024-ACBL-25
- A&C Panel Report (revised 8/6/24)
- ♠ In re: Deepak Aurora, 2024-ACBL-26
- A&C Panel Report (revised 8/6/24)
- ♠ In re: Patricia Corich and Beverly Baumgartner, 2024-ACBL-27
- Panel Report (posted 5/1/24)
- ♠ In re: Sandra Tamaccio, 2024-ACBL-28
- Panel Report (revised 5/15/24)
- ♠ In re: Jan Lesha, 2024-ACBL-29
- Panel Report (posted 5/1/24)
- ♠ In re: David and Sylvia Levison, 2024-ACBL-31
- Panel Report (revised 5/15/24)
- ♠ In re: Ernest and Flo Seger, 2024-ACBL-32
- Panel Report (posted 5/1/24)
- ♠ In re: Franni Weisman, 2024-ACBL-33
- Panel Report (posted 5/1/24)
- ♠ In re: Susan Snyder, 2024-ACBL-34
- Panel Report (posted 5/1/24)
- ♠ In re: Gerty and Sedat Nassi, 2024-ACBL-35
- A&C Panel Report (posted 5/1/24)
- ♠ In re: Mitchell Heide, 2024-ACBL-36
- Panel Report (posted 5/21/24)
- ♠ In re: Bobbie Ruff, 2024-ACBL-37
- A&C Panel Report (posted 5/15/24)
- ♠ In re: Perry Snyder, 2024-ACBL-38
- Panel Report (revised 5/15/24)
- ♠ In re: Amy and Ian Goldberg, 2024-ACBL-39
- A&C Panel Report (revised 8/6/24)
- ♠ In re: Maddy Gilbert, 2024-ACBL-40
- Panel Report (posted 5/1/24)
- ♠ In re: Christian Murie, 2024-ACBL-41
- Panel Report (posted 5/1/24)
- ♠ In re: Barbara Kalnitsky, 2024-ACBL-42
- Panel Report (posted 5/1/24)
- ♠ In re: Celine Rousseau, 2024-ACBL-43
- Panel Report (revised 5/15/24)
- ♠ In re: Cecilia and Joseph Tse, 2024-ACBL-44
- Panel Report (revised 5/15/24)
- ♠ In re: Jacqueline Cohen, 2024-ACBL-46
- Panel Report (revised 5/15/24)
- ♠ In re: Sunny Berson, 2024-ACBL-47
- Panel Report (posted 5/1/24)
- ♠ In re: Karen Beinner, 2024-ACBL-48
- Panel Report (posted 5/1/24)
- ♠ In re: Florie Goldman, 2024-ACBL-49
- Panel Report (posted 5/17/24)
- ♠ In re: Elizabeth Novak, 2024-ACBL-50
- Panel Report (posted 5/1/24)
- ♠ In re: Bonnie Rothenberg, 2024-ACBL-51
- Panel Report (posted 5/1/24)
- ♠ In re: Reva Oren, 2024-ACBL-52
- Panel Report (posted 5/1/24)
- ♠ In re: Bonnie Clement, 2024-ACBL-53
- Panel Report (posted 5/1/24)
- ♠ In re: Anna Stupak, 2024-ACBL-54
- Panel Report (posted 5/21/24)
- ♠ In re: Vivian Mottola, 2024-ACBL-55
- Panel Report (revised 5/15/24)
- ♠ In re: Malvina Nicoll, 2024-ACBL-56
- Panel Report (posted 5/1/24)
- ♠ In re: Judy Geleerd, 2024-ACBL-57
- Panel Report (revised 5/15/2024)
- ♠ In re: Irene Kozil, 2024-ACBL-58
- Panel Report (posted 5/1/24)
- ♠ In re: Lynn Heller, 2024-ACBL-60
- Panel Report (revised 5/15/24)
- ♠ In re: David and Jean Makey, 2024-ACBL-62
- A&C Panel Report (posted 5/1/24)
- ♠ In re: Marge Ehrenfeld, 2024-ACBL-63
- Panel Report (revised 5/15/24)
- ♠ In re: Sheryl Bates and Carol Feuger, 2024-ACBL-64
- Panel Report (posted 5/17/24)
- ♠ In re: Lucille Rosen, 2024-ACBL-66
- Panel Report (posted 6/5/24)
- ♠ In re: Steve Kaessner, 2024-ACBL-68
- A&C Panel Report (posted 5/17/24)
- ♠ In re: James Miller, 2024-ACBL-71(A)
- Panel Report (posted 5/29/24)
- ♠ In re: In re: Bob Becker, 2024-ACBL-74
- A&C Panel Report (posted 6/10/24)
- ♠ In re: In re: Jack Bierig, 2024-ACBL-76
- A&C Panel Report (posted 6/28/24)
- ♠ In re: Henry Boch, 2024-ACBL-77
- Panel Report (posted 6/28/24)
- ♠ In re: Pamela Boch, 2024-ACBL-78
- Panel Report (posted 6/28/24)
- ♠ In re: Jane Clark, 2024-ACBL-79
- Panel Report (posted 6/28/24)
- ♠ In re: Pamela Corrona, 2024-ACBL-82
- Management Panel Report (posted 7/9/24)
- ♠ In re: Nancy Dykhouse, 2024-ACBL-83
- Panel Report (posted 6/28/24)
- ♠ In re: Rose Garritsen, 2024-ACBL-84
- Panel Report (posted 7/1/24)
- ♠ In re: Terry Golden, 2024-ACBL-86
- Panel Report (posted 7/1/24)
- ♠ In re: Arleen Golden, 2024-ACBL-87
- Panel Report (posted 7/1/24)
- ♠ In re: Margaret Gose, 2024-ACBL-88
- Panel Report (posted 6/28/24)
- ♠ In re: John Henderson, 2024-ACBL-91
- Panel Report (posted 6/28/24)
- ♠ In re: Armanda Henderson, 2024-ACBL-92
- Panel Report (posted 6/28/24)
- ♠ In re: Jan Huiatt, 2024-ACBL-95
- Panel Report (posted 6/28/24)
- ♠ In re: Mike Huiatt, 2024-ACBL-96
- Panel Report (posted 6/28/24)
- ♠ In re: Rhona Jacobson, 2024-ACBL-98
- Panel Report (posted 6/28/24)
- ♠ In re: Carol Jenkinson, 2024-ACBL-99
- Panel Report (posted 6/28/24)
- ♠ In re: Pamela Jones, 2024-ACBL-101
- Panel Report (posted 6/28/24)
- ♠ In re: In re: Christina Jordan, 2024-ACBL-102
- A&C Panel Report (posted 6/19/24)
- ♠ In re: Gilda Joyce, 2024-ACBL-103
- Panel Report (posted 7/1/24)
- ♠ In re: Tony Joyce, 2024-ACBL-104
- Panel Report (posted 7/1/24)
- ♠ In re: Michael Kates, 2024-ACBL-105
- Panel Report (posted 6/28/24)
- ♠ In re: Toni Kimmel, 2024-ACBL-106
- Panel Report (posted 6/28/24)
- ♠ In re: Shari Kohoutek, 2024-ACBL-107
- Management Panel Report (posted 7/9/24)
- ♠ In re: Amelia Lee, 2024-ACBL-108
- Panel Report (posted 7/1/24)
- ♠ In re: Craig Linderman, 2024-ACBL-111
- Panel Report (posted 6/28/24)
- ♠ In re: Marianne Linderman, 2024-ACBL-112
- Panel Report (posted 6/28/24)
- ♠ In re: Reggie Lowenhar, 2024-ACBL-114
- Panel Report (posted 6/28/24)
- ♠ In re: Violet Makhija, 2024-ACBL-115
- Panel Report (posted 6/28/24)
- ♠ In re: Jasbeer Makhija, 2024-ACBL-116
- Panel Report (posted 6/28/24)
- ♠ In re: Norman Marks, 2024-ACBL-117
- A&C Panel Report (posted 6/5/24)
- ♠ In re: Henry Nemec, 2024-ACBL-122
- Panel Report (posted 7/1/24)
- ♠ In re: Edith Pilzer, 2024-ACBL-125
- Panel Report (posted 6/28/24)
- ♠ In re: Harvey Rapkin, 2024-ACBL-126
- Panel Report (posted 6/28/24)
- ♠ In re: Stanley Rosenthal, 2024-ACBL-127
- A&C Panel Report (posted 6/5/24)
- ♠ In re: Roman Ruegg, 2024-ACBL-128
- Panel Report (posted 6/28/24)
- ♠ In re: Donna Setzer, 2024-ACBL-129
- Panel Report (posted 6/28/24)
- ♠ In re: Paul Setzer, 2024-ACBL-130
- A&C Panel Report (posted 6/10/24)
- ♠ In re: Gail Shaps, 2024-ACBL-131
- Panel Report (posted 6/28/24)
- ♠ In re: Carol Slesar, 2024-ACBL-132
- Panel Report (posted 6/5/24)
- ♠ In re: Jacqueline Stultz, 2024-ACBL-134
- Panel Report (posted 6/5/24)
- ♠ In re: Dora Lee Sullins, 2024-ACBL-135
- Panel Report (posted 7/1/24)
- ♠ In re: Rajalakshmy Sundara, 2024-ACBL-136
- Panel Report (posted 6/28/24)
- ♠ In re: Herve Tremblay, 2024-ACBL-137
- Panel Report (posted 7/2/24)
- ♠ In re: William Velick, 2024-ACBL-139
- A&C Panel Report (posted 6/10/24)
- ♠ In re: Diane Velick, 2024-ACBL-140
- Management Panel Report (posted 7/9/24)
- ♠ In re: Bob Weaver, 2024-ACBL-141
- Panel Report (posted 6/28/24)
- ♠ In re: Linda Weaver, 2024-ACBL-142
- Panel Report (posted 6/28/24)
- ♠ In re: Leonora White, 2024-ACBL-143
- Panel Report (posted 6/28/24)
- ♠ In re: Michael White, 2024-ACBL-144
- Panel Report (posted 6/28/24)
- ♠ In re: Ellen Wright, 2024-ACBL-146
- Panel Report (posted 6/28/24)
- ♠ In re: Thomas Levanduski, 2024-ACBL-153
- Panel Report (posted 6/28/24)
- ♠ In re: Jim Reed, 2024-ACBL-154
- A&C Panel Report (posted 6/5/24)
- ♠ In re: Nancy Ruegg, 2024-ACBL-155
- Panel Report (posted 6/5/24)
- ♠ In re: Steve Kaessner, 2024-ACBL-156
- A&C Panel Report (posted 7/9/24)
- ♠ In re: Marc Ashton, 2024-ACBL-159
- Panel Report (posted 8/19/24)
- ♠ In re: Ramona Bienstock, 2024-ACBL-160
- Panel Report (posted 8/19/24)
- ♠ In re: Cherry Blevins, 2024-ACBL-161
- Panel Report (posted 8/19/24)
- ♠ In re: Patricia Cantu, 2024-ACBL-163
- Panel Report (posted 8/19/24)
- ♠ In re: Marilyn Cavanaugh, 2024-ACBL-164
- Panel Report (posted 8/19/24)
- ♠ In re: Robert Cavanaugh, 2024-ACBL-165
- Panel Report (posted 8/19/24)
- ♠ In re: Joan Colbert, 2024-ACBL-166
- Panel Report (posted 8/19/24)
- ♠ In re: Ron Colbert, 2024-ACBL-167
- Panel Report (posted 8/19/24)
- ♠ In re: Carol Davis, 2024-ACBL-168
- Panel Report (posted 8/19/24)
- ♠ In re: Joel Farber, 2024-ACBL-171
- Panel Report (posted 8/19/24)
- ♠ In re: Helene Gersch, 2024-ACBL-174
- Panel Report (posted 8/19/24)
- ♠ In re: Monica Gutierrez, 2024-ACBL-175
- Panel Report (posted 8/19/24)
- ♠ In re: Linda Hahn, 2024-ACBL-177
- Panel Report (posted 8/19/24)
- ♠ In re: Marlys Haraden, 2024-ACBL-178
- Panel Report (posted 8/19/24)
- ♠ In re: Tina Heldman, 2024-ACBL-179
- Panel Report (posted 8/19/24)
- ♠ In re: Carol Holmes, 2024-ACBL-180
- Panel Report (posted 8/19/24)
- ♠ In re: Lois Horwitz, 2024-ACBL-181
- Panel Report (posted 8/19/24)
- ♠ In re: Lelia Jackson, 2024-ACBL-182
- Panel Report (posted 8/19/24)
- ♠ In re: Daniel Jacobson, 2024-ACBL-183
- Panel Report (posted 8/19/24)
- ♠ In re: Richard Kjonaas, 2024-ACBL-184
- Panel Report (posted 8/19/24)
- ♠ In re: Jerry Leake, 2024-ACBL-186
- Panel Report (posted 8/19/24)
- ♠ In re: Andrew Lyman, 2024-ACBL-187
- Panel Report (posted 8/19/24)
- ♠ In re: Mario Mory, 2024-ACBL-193
- A&C Panel Report (posted 7/30/24)
- ♠ In re: In re: Phyllis Mory, 2024-ACBL-194
- A&C Panel Report (posted 7/30/24)
- ♠ In re: Bon Nguyen, 2024-ACBL-195
- Panel Report (posted 8/19/24)
- ♠ In re: Carole Noreen, 2024-ACBL-196
- Panel Report (posted 8/19/24)
- ♠ In re: James O’Grady, 2024-ACBL-197
- Panel Report (posted 8/19/24)
- ♠ Dexter Perkins III, 2024-ACBL-198
- A&C Panel Report (posted 9/3/24)
- ♠ In re: Elizabeth Silverman, 2024-ACBL-202
- Panel Report (posted 8/19/24)
- ♠ In re: Beckie Stasi, 2024-ACBL-205
- A&C Panel Report (posted 8/19/24)
- ♠ In re: Sid Stern, 2024-ACBL-206
- Panel Report (posted 8/19/24)
- ♠ In re: William Wall, 2024-ACBL-208
- Panel Report (posted 8/19/24)
- ♠ In re: Francis Walton, 2024-ACBL-209
- Panel Report (posted 8/19/24)
- ♠ In re: Mary Ann Walton, 2024-ACBL-210
- Panel Report (posted 8/19/24)
- ♠ In re: Jan Hendrix, 2024-ACBL-237
- A&C Panel Report (posted 9/10/24)
- ♠ Allen Rew, 2024-ACBL-270
- A&C Panel Report (posted 9/10/24)
- ♠ David Braverman, 2024-ACBL-291
- A&C Panel Report (posted 9/10/24)
- ♠ Keith Schwols, 2024-ACBL-301
- A&C Panel Report (posted 9/10/24)
- ♠ In re: Mary Jane Mucklo and Laura Palascak, 2023-ACBL – 1
- A&C Hearing Report (posted 2/25/23)
- ♠ In re: Paul Birnbaum, Evan Markowitz and Jared Markowitz, 2023-ACBL–2
- A&C Hearing Report (posted 8/24/23)
- ♠ In re: Betty and Denis Taneri, 2023-ACBL-4
- OEOC Hearing Report (posted 4/24/23)
- A&C Hearing Report (posted 9/13/23)
- ♠ In re: Michele Shahrabani, Jacqueline Shasha and Lily Yousfan, 2023-ACBL-5
- A&C Hearing Report (posted 9/13/23)
- ♠ In re: Tom Meleney and Ellen Tobin, 2023-ACBL–6
- OEOC Hearing Report (posted 8/21/23)
- A&C Hearing Report (posted 10/9/23)
- ♠ In re: Maurine and William Wacks, 2023-ACBL-7
- A&C Hearing Report (posted 2/25/23)
- ♠ In re: Penelope and Michael Isermann, 2023-ACBL – 8
- A&C Hearing Report (posted 2/25/23)
- ♠ In re: Babs and Walt Clingo, 2023-ACBL-9
- OEOC Hearing Report (posted 10/10/23)
- A&C Hearing Report (posted 1/2/2024)
- ♠ In re: Linda Daniel and Linda Thornton, 2023-ACBL-10
- A&C Hearing Report (posted 4/19/23)
- ♠ In re: James Barush and Resa Becher, 2023-ACBL-12
- A&C Hearing Report (posted 11/8/23)
- ♠ In re: Woodrow Ban, Bud Fawks, and James Lewis, 2023-ACBL-13
- OECC Hearing Report (posted 12/3/23)
- A&C Hearing Report (posted 2/15/24)
- ♠ In re: Bobby Henderson and Nell McInnish, 2023-ACBL–14
- A&C Hearing Report (posted 8/24/23)
- ♠ In re: Samuel Baskinger and Judy Rothstein, 2023-ACBL-17
- OEOC Hearing Report (posted 11/8/23)
- A&C Hearing Report (posted 1/2/2024)
- ♠ In re: Detra Connolly and James Morin, 2023-ACBL–18
- A&C Hearing Report (posted 8/24/23)
- ♠ In re: Larry Bazinett and Teresa Loftus, 2023-ACBL–23
- A&C Hearing Report (posted 8/24/23)
- ♠ In re: Harold and Carol Emme, 2023-ACBL–24
- A&C Hearing Report (posted 8/24/23)
- ♠ In re: Gary Delestine and Ellie Pynes, 2023-ACBL–28
- A&C Hearing Report (posted 8/24/23)
- ♠ In re: Melvin and Rhea Ward, 2023-ACBL- 31
- A&C Hearing Report (posted 9/5/23)
- ♠ In re: Catherine and Mary Scarfi, 2023-ACBL-33
- A&C Hearing Report (posted 10/9/23)
- ♠ In re: Louis and Trudi Brown, 2023-ACBL-34
- A&C Hearing Report (posted 11/8/2023)
- ♠ In re: James Lilly and Barbara Lilly, 2023-ACBL-35
- IBA Decision (posted 1/31/24)
- ♠ In re: Marilia Davies, 2023-ACBL-37
- IBA Decision (posted 10/20/23)
- ♠ In re: Garald Bumgardner and Mark Schollenberger, 2023-ACBL-38
- IBA Decision (posted 12/11/23)
- ♠ In re: Maryann Brewer and Tehmtan Tehsildar, 2023-ACBL-42
- A&C Hearing Report (posted 11/8/2023)
- ♠ In re: Judith and Robert Smith, 2023-ACBL-43
- A&C Hearing Report (posted 11/8/2023)
- ♠ In re: Michael Davis and Harvey Feltquate, 2023-ACBL-46
- A&C Hearing Report (posted 11/8/2023)
- ♠ In re: Sandy Richardson and Muhammad Qamar Malik, 2023-ACBL-48
- IBA Decision (posted 3/30/2024)
- ♠ In re: Eugene Haddock and Marie Lucci, 2023-ACBL-49
- IBA Decision (posted 2/9/2024)
- ♠ In re: In re: Harendra and Geeta Desai, 2023-ACBL-50
- A&C Hearing Report (posted 1/2/2024)
- ♠ In re: Barat and Lynne Shah, 2023-ACBL-51
- A&C Hearing Report (posted 11/8/2023)
- ♠ In re: Vera Mandell and John Soldano, 2023-ACBL-53
- A&C Hearing Report (pposted 1/2/2024)
- ♠ In re Charles and Jane Zempel, 2022-ACBL-4
- ♠ In re Allan Siebert, 2022-ACBL-5(A)
- ♠ In re Marcia Hixson, 2022-ACBL-5(B)
- ♠ In re: Chris and Susan Owens, 2022-ACBL-6
- ♠ In re: Charlene Friedman and Cynthia Yock, 2022-ACBL-7
- ♠ In re: Azalea and John Noronha, 2022-ACBL-10
- ♠ In re: Vernon Hodge and Carolyn Motes, 2022-ACBL-12
- OEOC Hearing Report
- A&C Hearing Report (posted 11/10/22)
- ♠ In re: Roger and Sharon Anderson, 2022-ACBL-14
- ♠ In re: Marilyn Bein and Harry Price, 2022-ACBL-16
- ♠ In re Delbert and Ella Haylock, 2022-ACBL-17
- OEOC Hearing Report
- A&C Hearing Report (posted 11/10/22)
- ♠ In re: Sherman Gao, 2022-ACBLD22-19 (posted October 27, 2022)
- District 22 Hearing Report
- A&C Hearing Report (posted 2/25/23)
- ♠ In re Brian and Lucie McCartney, 2022-ACBL-20 (posted on 10/4/2022)
- ♠ In re: Ann and Bill Nutting, 2022-ACBL-24
- OEOC Hearing Report (posted 1/25/2023)
- A &C Hearing Report (posted 4/19/23)
- ♠ In re: David and Dianne Copi, 2022-ACBL-25
- A&C Hearing Report (posted 12/2/2022)
- ♠ In re Robert Byrum and Louis Lipset, 2022-ACBL-27
- ♠ In re Norman and Kathryn Hasty, 2022-ACBL-28
- ♠ In re: Bill and Donna Jensen, 2022-ACBL-29
- ♠ In re: Jerome Haber and Susan Laitmon, 2022-ACBL-30
- ♠ In re: Larry Abramovitz and Karen Pickelsimer, 2022-ACBL-31 (posted on 12/29/2022)
- ♠ In re: Bala and Pracheth Srinivasan, 2022-ACBL-32
- OEOC Hearing Report (posted 11/16/2022)
- A&C Hearing Report (posted 12/29/2022)
- ♠ In re: Evan Fann and Ronald Fennell, 2022-ACBL-33
- OEOC Hearing Report (posted 11/19/2022)
- A&C Hearing Report (posted 1/25/2022)
- ♠ In re: Adrienne and James Halperin, 2022-ACBL-34
- OEOC Hearing Report (posted 12/2/2022)
- A&C Hearing Report (posted 12/2/2022)
- ♠ In re: Hansa and Sobhagchand Haria, 2022-ACBL-35 (posted on 1/4/2023)
- OEOC Hearing Report (posted 12/2/2022)
- A&C Hearing Report (posted 2/25/23)
- ♠ In re: Patrick Maloney and Carol O’Brien, 2022-ACBL-36
- A&C Hearing Report (posted 1/25/2022)
- ♠ In re: Wayne McIntyre and Sally Reed, 2022-ACBL–37
- OEOC Hearing Report (posted 8/21/2023)
- A&C Hearing Report (posted 10/9/2023)
- ♠ In re: Nancy Farmer and Luther Merry, 2022-ACBL-38
- A&C Hearing Report (posted on 1/4/2023)
- In re: Bill Lietzow, 2022-ACBL-39
- A&C Hearing Report (posted on 1/25/2023)
- ♠ In re: Renate and Ronald Conlon, 2022-ACBL-41 (posted on 12/29/2022)
- A&C Hearing Report (posted 12/29/2022)
- ♠ In re: Kenneth and Sallie Abelson, 2022-ACBL-42
- OEOC Hearing Report (posted on 04/28/2023)
- A&C Hearing Report (posted on 9/13/2023)
- ♠ In re: Mary Brown and Emma Horrell, 2022-ACBL-43
- OEOC Hearing Report (posted 3/3/2023)
- A&C Hearing Report (posted 9/5/2023)
- ♠ In re: Ellen and Rob Crawford, 2022-ACBL-44
- OEOC Hearing Report (posted 3/17/2023)
- A&C Hearing Report (posted 9/5/2023)
- ♠ In re: James and Sue Jordan, 2022-ACBL-45 (posted on 12/29/2022)
- A&C Hearing Report (posted 12/29/2022)
- ♠ In re: J Wilmer Winsor and Shiree Shafrir, 2022-ACBL- 46
- OEOC Hearing Report (posted 4/3/2023)
- A&C Hearing Report (posted 9/5/2023)
- ♠ In re: Bill and Judy Farrar, 2022-ACBL-47
- OEOC Hearing Report (posted 8/24/2023)
- A&C Hearing Report (posted 9/13/2023)
-
- ♠ In re: Keith Harrison and Joan Webb, 2021-ACBL-1
-
- ♠ In re: Burton Goodman and Nina Gottlieb, 2021-ACBL-2
- ♠ In re: Dennis Blackketter and Nancy Motlong, 2021-ACBL-3(A) and (B)
- ♠ In re: John Moore and Roxann Swenson, 2021-ACBL-4
- ♠ In re: David and Mary McCarron, 2021-ACBL-6
- ♠ In re: David and Rosalind Gordon, 2021-ACBL-7
- ♠ In re: Genny and Yuri Lemeshev, 2021-ACBL- 8
- ♠ In re: Attila Dagdeviren, 2021-ACBL-9
- ♠ In re: Suzanne Budabin and Nick Sehgal, , 2021-ACBL-11
- In re: William Salomon and Marcia Sidney, 2021-ACBL-12
- ♠ In re: Jerome and Margot Halperin, 2021-ACBL-13
OEOC Hearing Report
A & C Hearing Report
-
-
- ♠ In re: Paul Rizza and Jo Watson, 2021-ACBL-15
-
OEOC Hearing Report
A & C Hearing Report
-
-
- ♠ In re: Annette Johns and Jim Loffree, 2021-ACBL-17
- ♠ In re: Howie and Linda Halpern, 2021-ACBL-18
- ♠ In re: Pat Barrow and Cece Spain, 2021-ACBL-19
- ♠ In re: Joseph and Rachel Peled, 2021-ACBL-20
- ♠ In re: Daniel Thompson, 2021-ACBL-21
-
-
-
- ♠ In re: Jack and Sheila Stein, 2020-ACBL-34
- ♠ In re: Iraj and Farah Shemirani, 2020-ACBL-33
- ♠ In re: Lorna Davis, 2020-ACBL-32
- ♠ In re: Joe Pepe, Jr., 2020-ACBL-31
- ♠ In re: Mark and Larisa Rappaport, 2020-ACBL-30
- ♠ In re: Kenneth Hirshon and Jerry Ruther, 2020-ACBL-29
- ♠ In re: Antonio Cioffi and Rick Schneider, 2020-ACBL-28
- ♠ In re: Willis and Barbara Monie, 2020-ACBL-27
- ♠ In re: Jeffrey and Maureen Stewart, 2020-ACBL-25
- ♠ In re: Samir Zeine, 2020-ACBL-24
- ♠ In re: Allan Rosenblum and Martin Singer, 2020-ACBL-23
- ♠ In re: Stephen and Janice Kishner, 2020-ACBL-22(A)&(B)
- ♠ In re: Michael and Suzanne Crawford, 2020-ACBL-21(A)&(B)
- ♠ In re: Robert and Ellen Kent, 2020-ACBL-20
- ♠ In re: Sylvia Shi, 2020-ACBL-19
- ♠ In re: Kay Schulle and Gerald Sosler, 2020-ACBL-18
- ♠ In re: Devlin Delaney and David Sweet, 2020-ACBL-17
- ♠ In re: Alan Rowen and Roger Zellmer, 2020-ACBL-16
- ♠ In re: Ronald and Brigette Freidman, 2020-ACBL-13
- ♠ In re: Bill and Sue Malin, 2020-ACBL-12
- ♠ In re: Gail Hanson and Michael Innis, 2020-ACBL-11
- ♠ In re: Louis and Barbara Meola, 2020-ACBL-10
- ♠ In re: Richard and Donna Holland, 2020-ACBL-9
- ♠ In re: Vincent Messina and Noreen Pitts, 2020-ACBL-8
- ♠ In re: Gene Petrey, 2020-ACBL-7
- ♠ In re: Gayle Gerth-Levine, 2020-ACBL-6
-
-
-
- ♠ In re: Jack Adams, 2019-ACBLD16-5
- ♠ In re: Susan Jackson, 2019-ACBL-4
- ♠ In re: Michael and Linda Windham, 2019-ACBL-3
- ♠ In re: Richard Golmon, 2019-ACBLU221-2
- ♠ In re: Sherman Gao, 2019-ACBL-1
-
-
-
- ♠ In re: Ralph Herz, 2018-ACBLU174-4
-
Resources for All
Resources for Recorders
Recorder RegulationsActive Ethics
Actively ethical bridge players do everything they can within the scope of the game to defeat their opponent at the bridge table while making that experience an otherwise enjoyable one for them.
A primary objective of the ACBL is to continue the concerted effort that was inaugurated at the Fall 1986 Atlanta NABC to try to instill in all players the concept that vigorous efforts should be made to insure equity and enjoyment are benchmarks of Bridge.
Every player should strive to make sure that opponents have in no way been harmed through incomplete or misleading information as to the meanings of his pair’s coventional calls and treatments. An aggressive approach along these lines on the part of each and every individual will do much to make sure that Bridge remains the game that you enjoy so much.
A major tenet of active ethics is the principle of full disclosure. This means that all information available to your partnership must be made available to your opponents.
Let’s take a look at weak two bids from the point of view of full disclosure. When an established partnership opens a weak two bid, they have a great deal of information of which their opponents are not aware. The convention card discloses the point range, but little else. However, the partners are aware of the range of hands on which the bid can be made (discipline?, suit quality requirements?, five-or-seven card suits allowed?, side four-card major ok?, void ok?, positional variations?, etc). Full disclosure requires that all these inferences, restrictions and tendencies be made known to any opponent who inquires about their style.
If you are interested in knowing these things about your opponent’s bid, merely say to the bidder’s partner, “Would you tell me more about your style?” You may use the style inquiry’ to ask about any call your opponent makes.
The actively ethical player will often go beyond what is technically required in volunteering information to the opponents. Quite often, the declaring side in an actively ethical partnership will volunteer such information before the opening lead is made. (But remember, when there has been misinformation given, such as a failure to alert or a mis-alert, there is a LEGAL obligation on the player whose partner misinformed the opponents. He, the bidder, must give the opponents the correct information at the end of the auction if his side is the declaring side or at the end of the play if his side is defending.)
New players or infrequent partnerships usually will not have understandings about the items discussed here and , of course, it will be perfectly proper for them to reply “We have no agreement as to style.”
The actively ethical player makes a concerted effort to catch up when they have fallen behind, regardless of the reason for their lateness. All players are expected to develop this good habit.
Remember: Slow play is subject to penalty, and the penalties are well earned when slow pairs disrupt the normal progression of the game.
Additionally, players should be available to start each subsequent round promptly, avoiding wherever possible, being late to a table for non-bridge reasons.
At the discretion of the TD, slow play penalties will be deemed to be either disciplinary (and unappealable) or procedural. If the latter, appeals committees should tend strongly to reject all routine appeals against slow play penalties. When they do deny such an appeal, they should consider imposing an additional penalty for a frivolous appeal. The burden is on the appellant to demonstrate that some unusual circumstance makes the penalty inappropriate.
All ACBL events are “governed” by the appropriate convention chart which lists those conventions permitted in the event. Conventions not included on the chart are not permitted in the event.
Part of the “right” to use a convention is the responsibility of deciding when it applies in probable auctions. The opponents may be entitled to redress if you did not originally have a clear understanding with your partner of when and how to use a convention you are playing.
For example, a partnership that chooses to play conventional bids over opponents notrump opening bids is expected to have discussed at least the following:
-
-
- Does it apply over strong notrumps?
- Does it apply over weak notrumps?
- Does it apply in the direct seat?
- Does it apply in the balancing chair?
- Does it apply when used by a passed hand?
-
We all occasionally encounter situations where we are not sure what partner’s bidding means. There exists an added responsibility if that uncertainty arises from a convention you and your partner have agreed to play. In these situations, you should tell your opponents all you know. Sometimes, the director will even ask you or your partner to step away from the table so that the opponents can talk openly with the remaining player.
Actively ethical players do everything possible in these situations to bring their opponents back to even terms — to remove any possible disadvantage accruing to them from their side’s failure to have a complete conventional understanding.
Zero Tolerance Policy
View the Zero Tolerance Policy Zero Tolerance Video Seminar
Note: forms must be completed in ink when submitted by mail. For help with these procedures and/or forms, please call the Compliance Coordinator at 662-253-3146.
Mailing Address:
ACBL
Attn: National Recorder
6575 Windchase Blvd.
Horn Lake MS 38637.
ZERO TOLERANCE POLICY
Zero Tolerance Policy
The ultimate purpose of the Z-T policy is to create a much more pleasant atmosphere in our NABCs. We are attempting to eradicate unacceptable behavior in order to make the game of bridge more enjoyable for all. Below are some examples of commendable behavior, which, while not required, will significantly contribute to the improved atmosphere:- Being a good 'host' or 'guest' at the table.
- Greeting others in a friendly manner.
- Praising the bidding and/or play of the opponents
- Having two clearly completed convention cards readily available to the opponents (This one is a regulation, not just a nicety)
The following are some examples of behavior which will not be tolerated:
- Badgering, rudeness, insinuations, intimidation, profanity, threats, or violence.
- Negative comments concerning opponents' or partner's play or bidding.
- Constant and gratuitous lessons and analyses at the table.
- Loud and disruptive arguing with a director's ruling.
- At the start of each event, the director shall make an announcement that the tournament will be observing ZERO TOLERANCE for unacceptable behavior. It is requested that the director be called whenever behavior is not consistent with the guidelines outlined above.
- The director, when called, shall make an assessment of the situation. If it is established that there was unacceptable behavior, an immediate ¼ board disciplinary penalty (3 IMP in team games) shall be assigned to all offenders. This may involve any one or all four players at the table irrespective of who initiated the unacceptable behavior. If both members of a partnership are guilty, the penalties are additive (¼ board EACH = ½ board!). The Board of Directors strongly believes that assignment of disciplinary penalties will improve the overall behavior at our tournaments.
- If it is determined that the same offender is responsible for a second offense in the same event, then the offender(s) shall be ejected from future competition in that event. An offender removed from an event shall be deemed to have not played in the event, no masterpoints will be awarded and no refunds will be made. All previously-obtained results shall, however, remain valid as to their effect upon other competitors. In the case of a serious offense and in the case of multiple offenses (three) during a tournament, a disciplinary committee may be convened to determine whether the offender(s) should be allowed to play in other events at the tournament and/or whether additional sanctions may be appropriate.
- Warnings are strongly discouraged and will be given only when there is no clear violation or in cases where the facts cannot be determined. Offenders are to receive immediate penalties. Regardless of who may have initiated unacceptable behavior, ALL offenses are punishable. Retaliatory behavior is a punishable offense. Frivolous accusations will also be considered as offenses under this policy.
- In accordance with the Laws of Duplicate Bridge, a director's decision to impose a disciplinary penalty is final; however, all such decisions may be appealed. An appeals committee may not overturn the director's decision, but could recommend that the director reconsider the imposition of a penalty. It should be noted that the committee may feel that the penalty assessed was not severe enough and may refer the matter to a disciplinary committee.
- The DIC shall provide a summary report of all behavioral penalties to the Tournament Chairman and/or Recorder.